Whether or not your landlord can increase your rent all depends on your tenancy agreement - and more specifically, if it states how exactly long you are staying in the property.

If your tenancy agreement states how long you are staying in the property…

If your tenancy agreement states how long you are staying in the property, then you have what is known as a ‘fixed-term tenancy’ - and your landlord cannot increase your rent for this fixed period of time, unless you agree. If you don’t agree, your rent may only be increased after the end of the period.

This is because, whether you rented a flat for two years or a holiday home for two weeks, your rent is fixed in your tenancy agreement from the moment you move in to the moment your tenancy agreement ends. To change this agreement, your landlord requires your consent.

When can your landlord increase the rent during a fixed-term tenancy?

There is an important exception here, though. If there’s a clause in your tenancy agreement which sets out how, when and by how much your landlord will increase your rent, then your landlord is still allowed to increase your rent during your fixed period of tenancy.

If your tenancy agreement does not state how long you are staying in the property…

If your tenancy agreement does not state how long you are staying in the property, then you have what is called a ‘statutory tenancy’ - which means that your landlord can increase your rent.

However, landlords cannot just increase your rent whenever and however they want; there are important rules that they must strictly follow. As explained on the 

, “your landlord cannot normally increase the rent more than once a year without your agreement.”

Your landlord always needs your permission to increase the rent

Furthermore, for any tenancy, “your landlord must get your permission if they want to increase the rent by more than previously agreed”. When any rent increase is made, it must be “fair and realistic” - and this means it has to be in line with average local rents. These rules protect you from your landlord unfairly increasing your rent.

Can My Landlord Increase My Rent?

Good advice is expensive, a Swiss saying goes. That is commonly thought to be true for legal advice in particular. People are accordingly reluctant to call up a lawyer for legal advice when facing problems. CourtCorrect and the Swiss insurance company AXA-ARAG want to change that  by showing that legal advice can be easy, affordable and digital.

To that end, the two partners have launched a new offering for free legal advice for everyone in Switzerland. It will be provided entirely online through CourtCorrect’s established online legal system platform. Processing cases through a single, centralised platform as well as the use of AI will significantly reduce the cost of legal services, which has the potential to transform the legal market in Switzerland and make it more accessible.

Clients can describe and submit their cases through 

. AXA-ARAG’s legal experts will then provide an assessment of the legal situation and recommend steps that will help customers to solve their problem.

All legal topics will be covered from housing and property to  family and employment law. Replies will only take two business days and can be provided via email or phone, tailored to the preferences of the client. After that, customers can purchase further legal services to have their problems solved directly on the platform – for a fixed price of CHF 69.

‘Our goal with this new offering is to improve access to justice, remove barriers and get closer to our customers’, says Jürg Schneider, the CEO of AXA-ARAG. The pilot project will run until June 2022. The companies will use the time to collect customer feedback and bring the platform to perfection as they are considering to turn it into a permanent offering.

Project leaders are aiming to also use AI in the course of the pilot but regardless of that all processes are already fully digitised. This makes it easy for customers to solve their legal problems almost ‘from the couch’ through their smartphone. The basic idea was inspired by similar projects conducted by CourtCorrect in the UK, where they had been successfully offering free legal advice for a while. Consequently, CourtCorrect is responsible for all technological aspects of the project including the digital platform. 

CourtCorrect Launches Digital Legal Advice Project With AXA-ARAG In Switzerland

Who reads the fine print of their gym contract or the terms of conditions of their energy providers? The answer is most likely: nobody.

But that is a big problem as millions of people around the world are signing up to legal obligations and contracts that might sometimes have severe consequences for them.

And what is worse, they often are not aware of their rights that could help them defy negative terms and assert their role in society as free, independent citizens.

The London-based tech start-up CourtCorrect is now trying to change that.

, users are now able to find easy-to-understand information on their rights and obligations through a search interface that is reminiscent of Google in its user-friendly simplicity. Through typing in any cue in the search bar they will be able to find neat summaries of their rights regarding the chosen legal topic including answers to the most important questions. All of it is written in easy language and short paragraphs to ensure that the rather complex legal background is understandable to all.

If people visit CourtCorrect to find out if they can cancel their David Lloyd gym contract free-of-charge or if their landlord has to pay for a disrepair – they can get the answers at just one glance. Users are moreover able to follow contracts and rights of interest. Summaries are constantly updated so that users get notified when their rights change.

Rights explained easily thanks to technology

Ludwig Bull is the CEO and founder behind CourtCorrect. Together with his team, he’s on a mission to make justice more accessible to everyone. As laws have become ever more complex and legal services accordingly expensive and inaccessible, he believes that technology can help provide the reform that the legal system so urgently needs to serve everyone again.

Mr Bull says: “Knowing your rights, knowing what your boss can and cannot make you do, what your landlord has to do, is a great starting point for allowing everyone regardless of their means to get justice,”

“Technology such as the internet and AI have made it possible to make such crucial information understandable and accessible to all. There just had to be someone to take charge and make it reality – and that’s what we did!”

However, the search engine is only supposed to be the start. With the help of revolutionary AI that predicts court outcomes, CourtCorrect is working on a comprehensive platform solution to make not only legal information but also legal services and adjudication easily available again.

Mr Bull says: “In the 21st century, the law should be democratic, digital and easy to use – it’s about time that somebody makes sure that is the case.”

CourtCorrect Launches Free Legal Search Engine 

While the elderly and people with severe medical conditions are most obviously endangered by the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, another group of victims has often been overlooked. In-person teaching suspended, facilities closed, parties cancelled – students have seen their normal lifestyle disrupted as they are confined to isolation, not few of them in particularly harsh conditions in student accommodation. Despite this, many are still being confronted with steep bills by universities and landlords – for services that they no longer need or have never even received.

With a digital free-legal-support offering specifically for students, London tech start-up CourtCorrect is aiming to give them a voice.

Free legal advice for students facing hardship

“We are aware that many universities are working hard to live up to their commitments, even in difficult times as these,” says Ludwig Bull, CEO of CourtCorrect.

“But still many students are coming to us who have been subjected to, frankly, unacceptable conditions and are not aware of their options to stand up for themselves. As our mission is to increase access to justice, it seemed just natural to set up a comprehensive support scheme.”

Students that have faced problems with their universities due to the coronavirus, such as lectures that were cancelled without replacement, are invited to submit their claim through CourtCorrect’s digital legal platform. CourtCorrect’s very own legal team will assess the merit of the claims with the help of predictive AI. If the chances of success are reasonable, claims will be prepared for adjudication.

Ombudsman services, extra-judicial settlement, OIA

CourtCorrect is thereby also raising awareness of low-risk, extra-judicial routes to justice that not enough people are making use of. One example are the government’s ombudsman services and small claims courts that resolve disputes for little or no charge.

The ombudsman service for higher education, OIA, may award up to £5,000 to individual students for shortcomings in their education. However, knowledge of it is not wide-spread and the submission process remains inconvenient for users. CourtCorrect is on the way to change that. The service is free for students and entirely digital. CourtCorrect only charges a success fee of 10% if a claim yields financial compensation.

Several hundred claims have been assembled like that so far. Among them are students from Cambridge negotiating with their college about rental contracts and students claiming for compensation for missing out on teaching hours without substitute.

“What is most interesting about this, is that while we have received many claims from students and we helped a sizeable number to settle their cases, this still hasn’t led to a flood of compensation awards,” Mr Bull says.

“Clearly, providing easy access to justice like this helps meritorious cases get their due – but it does not cause undue pressure for organisations. On the contrary, our user-friendly process reduces the workload for both sides.

“This shows that what we are building can be a model to provide access to justice on a much larger scale in the future.”

CourtCorrect Helps Students Get Compensation For Poor University Services During Covid

CourtCorrect has secured a research partnership with the University of Cambridge and Hitotsubashi University, a prestigious Japanese university that is specialised exclusively in the social sciences. The joint project of the universities is led by Professor Sumida Mihoko from the Faculty of Law at Hitostubashi and will be exploring the logic of legal decision-making.

High-profile Cambridge research project on law and AI

More specifically, the academics are interested in the decision-making process that leads to 

 judgements. This international private law doctrine is well-established in many common law jurisdictions and Japan. The doctrine allows courts or other authorities to decline or substitute its own jurisdiction with that of another forum (for example, a foreign or superior court), as it may be legally more appropriate. Based on court data from around the world, researchers will be comparing the decision-making of human adjudicators and AI adjudication that results in the legal conclusion of 

CourtCorrect’s transformative AI technology and its unique dataset of millions of court cases from around the world was the crucial missing piece for the project. The company was founded with the mission to provide access to justice on the premise of a revolutionary AI case prediction tool. CEO Ludwig Bull and his team will contribute this tool to the project by extending the AI’s capacities to Japanese 

Could ‘Robots’ be replacing lawyers and judges?

While the subject of the research sounds abstract to laymen, the long-term goal is fairly practical: to develop AI that is sophisticated enough to provide reliable legal assessments. This could significantly reduce the cost of jurisprudence and legal services and allow more people from all background to understand and enforce their rights.

“The vision of this project sounds futuristic but that makes it all the more exciting,” says Mr Bull.

“In fact, we’re not far away from a fully operational AI that can support legal decision-making in everyday life and will improve access to justice.”

The project will kick off in late May and run for at least 12 months with an option for further extension.

CourtCorrect Secures Research Partnership With University Of Cambridge And Hitotsubashi University  

CourtCorrect, the London Tech start-up that revolutionised access to justice, is raising awareness for the precarious situation of gig economy workers, such as Deliveroo riders.

While signing up hundreds of riders to help them claim for more rights, they unearthed stories and inside documents that provide an unprecedented look behind the curtain of questionable practices in the industry.

Gig economy workers face tough working conditions

“You are neither an employee of Deliveroo, nor a worker within the meaning of any employment rights legislation”, Deliveroo’s 2021 rider agreement reads bluntly. In plain English: unlike workers and employees, riders don’t enjoy typical protection or rights.

The headlines rarely feature what this technicality means for the riders.

Remus N. is one of them and he told his story to CourtCorrect. The Romanian has been trying to make a living as a delivery driver in the UK for about three years.

His account is unsettling. Often, he would work for 12 hours but barely make more than £100 on good days – just above minimum wage. On top of it, he would be facing the costs that the gig economy relies on but doesn’t pay for. Insurance; car reparations; tickets and fines – none of it is covered. Social security or paid holidays are not part of the job description.

Mr N. ended up having his account – and his only source of income – cancelled when his scooter broke down and he couldn’t deliver an order. All pleading with the support team didn’t help – Mr N. was cut off from his livelihood.

Deliveroo claims riders don’t have employment rights

However, among many disconcerting clauses in a typical ‘Supplier Agreement’ retrieved by CourtCorrect is one that does not permit drivers to legally contend their status: “You … warrant that neither you nor anyone acting on your behalf will present any claim in ... any civil court in which it is contended that you are either an employee or a worker.”

“The Supreme Court recently ruled that Uber drivers are entitled to worker protections and are not self-employed; the judgment applies analogously across the gig economy,” says Ludwig Bull, CourtCorrect’s CEO.

He deploys the gimmicky tech from his Cambridge student start-ups (

, 1 November 2017) to take on a legal system that is not serving everyone equally. “Gig economy workers like Deliveroo riders are uniquely vulnerable because they don’t have access to justice while engaging in complex legal arrangements.”

Helping gig economy workers get access to justice

They are a classic case of a marginalised group that CourtCorrect helps to access their rights through collective bargaining, dispute resolution and litigation. Their portfolio also includes UberEats, Stuart and suppliers selling to companies like DPD.

“Gig economy workers have kept our society going, delivering food to those self-isolating during the pandemic at great personal risk”, Mr Bull says. “We owe them.“

“The future of Deliveroo and similar companies will remain uncertain until those problems are addressed,“ Mr Bull says. “We want to show them that a mutually beneficial solution is sustainable.”

CourtCorrect Helps Gig Economy Workers Enforce Employment Rights

CourtCorrect and the DIFC Courts have successfully completed a joint project to improve the courts’ technology for claimants. A CourtCorrect team of designers and legal experts has been deployed to Dubai for one month to prototype new procedures and digital tools in cooperation with the leaders of the Dubai Future Foundation (DFF) and the DIFC Courts itself.

The DFF is aiming to develop the technology that should help make Dubai one of the leading cities worldwide through developments in all areas of public life, including justice. The DFF’s 2022 start-up accelerator programme challenged companies to build user-friendly court technology for one of the most distinguished international courts, the DIFC Courts.

Selected for a competitive start-up accelerator

CourtCorrect’s pitch was shortlisted among more than 80 applicants. After an additional round of pitches, the company furthermore made it to the final round of two in Dubai, where they worked on the ground to develop their pitch into a prototype.

“We’re very proud to have got the chance to work with DIFC Courts, one of the major international financial courts,” Faidh Feisal, Head of Product at CourtCorrect, says.

“My team have done a fantastic job working with the client in Dubai to produce a prototype that will improve legal services for claimants specifically with smaller claims, who are the people that CourtCorrect wants to help.”

Technology to make international trade fairer

The DIFC is a special economic zone with its own jurisdiction as distinct from Dubai’s legal foundation. It is open to trade from around the world. Its courts are adjudicating disputes based on civil and commercial laws oriented towards English common law and interpreted by international common law judges. Among their clients are many SMEs trading with international partners through Dubai. CourtCorrect’s prototype will help businesses with insufficient legal expertise and means to argue their case when they are facing legal problems around the DIFC. By making the DIFC’s dispute resolution processes easier to handle, CourtCorrect and the courts are hoping to contribute to a fair international trade environment that allows access to justice to all participants regardless of size and resources.

Ludwig Bull, CEO of CourtCorrect says: “It’s a great sign that our user-friendly, accessible technology is now starting to leave a mark at courts around the world.”

“It shows that access to justice is a universal concern that has now reached the highest ranks of the international legal system, which blows the door wide open for CourtCorrect’s products.”

CourtCorrect Successfully Completes Start-Up Accelerator Project With DIFC Courts And Dubai Future Foundation

Over the last few years, Facebook has produced almost more headlines over compromising its users' data privacy than with what was intended to be its core function: being a social network where people can discuss with their friends from anywhere in the world.

 case to Facebook's breach of confidentiality and you’ll understand why these invasions of privacy are getting more dangerous than ever. What have Facebook’s data excesses got to do with reproductive rights and what can you do to stay safe and protect your data on social networks?

 case already has (and will have in the future) a huge impact on Women's Rights. As a quick reminder, the 

 case was first judged in 1973 by the U.S. Supreme Court. It conferred on American women the right to have an abortion during the first trimester of pregnancy or when the mother's life was at risk, regardless of state laws. This decision was welcomed by Americans and, almost fifty years later, remains one of the most important decisions ever taken by the Supreme Court.

 was overturned in June 2022. The decision went against the popular opinion, as 

, and thousands went to the streets to protest the decision. Nevertheless, considering the fact that a majority of Supreme Court Justices have been picked by Republican presidents, this ruling had been expected.

Facebook and abortions: how a social network becomes a government tool

. These abortions obviously have to be undertaken in secret, as women are fearing for their safety and freedom, making abortions all the more dangerous.

This is where Facebook comes in: the network stores data from private conversations and has previously handed it over to the local police that use it, for example, as evidence for abortions in states where they are illegal. This is, for example, what happened in Nebraska, 

 after exchanging messages about the girl’s abortion online.

What does the law say on data rights and law enforcement?

This is a problematic use of private data for law enforcement, as while Facebook messages can be considered evidence in court, this is only valid if you either sent or received said message. Hence, Facebook pirating chats from its own platform don’t amount to legal proof and should be rejected by the court.

It should also be technically impossible as Meta offers the function to end-to-end encrypt messages on its social networks. However, as of now, this option is still not the default and users have to manually select it to make sure their messages are not readable by anyone other than the recipient.

Is the justice system run via infringements of privacy?

While this is not the first time the social network is accused of compromising its users' privacy in ways they are not aware of, this might be among the most problematic ones yet. It is a case where Facebook's data infringements support the enforcement of laws, which are moreover seen by some as violating important civil rights.

As Facebook has probably violated every cyber privacy law ever made over the last decade, it seems quite ironic that it is working with law enforcement to persecute violations of the law, especially via such controversial methods.

This is even more ironic when contrasted with Mark Zuckerberg's take on the matter: “Protecting people’s privacy is always important, I get that this is extra salient right now [with] the Supreme Court decision and that specifically bearing on privacy”.

The fact that our juridic system is relying on social networks compromising data privacy to for law enforcement is not only concerning, but it also sets a worrying precedent for the future. While artificial intelligence can be a great asset for our legal system, it goes without saying that this is not what most of the world was envisioning – even more so if the laws that are enforced are similarly controversial as in the aboriton case.

Legal education for more data security against the tech overreach

But this is not how it has to be - why is there such a lack of awareness of data breaches on one hand and data protection and data privacy rights on the other hand?

The case of Facebooks shows that awareness of the use of social network data as evidence as well as of the option to use end-to-end encryption can help people to protect their privacy.

Enhanced legal awareness could help people make decisions about avoiding potentially compromising situations. It could also help them defend themselves by technological and also legal means as they would know what they’re entitled to and can claim for in court.

Finally, it could also produce wider public pressure for policy change to rein in the use of private data from social networks.

CourtCorrect: a digital legal support platform for digital rights

Here, the positive opportunities of tech and digital – and hence easily accessible – offerings are far from exhausted.

Platforms such as CourtCorrect are working on implementing technology that helps people gain easier access to understanding and enforcement of their rights.

That is, on one hand, through a tool where people can obtain easy legal information and answers to their questions for free.

On the other hand, CourtCorrect’s platform guides users through the legal system and towards the right legal action and legal service based on the legal information they receive.

Useful links: how to protect your online privacy and confidential data

Here are a few tips to keep in mind to insure your online safety:

If you found this article useful and want help in greater details on how to stay safe online, please click 

 for the most essential data security tips  social networks. If you are seeking an abortion in the United States, click 

 for how for more info on how to do so without having to worry about your digital privacy and security.

How Facebook's Problematic Handling Of Data Privacy Could Become A Threat To Justice

In this article, we will guide you through the legal process of getting your invoices paid, from the very first invoice you send to taking your customer to court if necessary. 

How long should I wait before sending an invoice reminder to my customer?

Your customer legally has thirty calendar days (be careful, as this is not the same as working days) to pay you for your work. Reminder: day 1 is when your client receives the invoice reference, not when you send it. After the thirty days have passed, do not hesitate to send them a polite reminder that you are still waiting to be paid, and ask about the reason of the delay so you are aware of any financial difficulties your client might be facing.

I've sent a reminder, and my client is still not responding. What now?

If you’ve already sent a few nice emails asking to be paid and still haven’t heard back from your customer, chances are they are ignoring you. You might want to try to call them directly, as maybe your emails haven’t been coming through, or you may be able to talk to someone else (if your customer is a small business or a company) who could fix the issue.

In the scenario where this does not work, your next best option is to send your customer what is called a ‘letter before action’. This formal letter should include the work you’ve done in details, with dates and invoice reference; how much your customer owes you; how long they have been owing you money (this should be since you first sent the invoice fee); what your next step will be if they don’t pay you (this could be getting professional legal help, taking them to court, etc.); your payment details; and the deadline for the payment, after which you will be moving on to the next step.

If your issue still hasn’t been resolved, it's appropriate to consider legal action. The next step could be to seek some more legal advice over the unpaid invoices. That way you can make sure the law is on your side and get some reassurance on what is the right thing to do next. If you don't know where to start just go to CourtCorrect and use our free legal help tool. After you describe your problem, you will receive an instant legal assessment of your situation for free. If you wish, we will then connect you to the right person (usually a legal professional) to help you with additional legal advice or who can support you over legal action. 

One such option would be to take your customer to court. The court is here to help you with debt recovery and debt collection. Essentially, if the court decides you're in the right, they will handle chasing unpaid invoices for you, including the employment of debt collectors if necessary. 

Regarding the courts you should consult, you have two different options: you can take them to the Small Claims Court (depending on where you live in the UK, the Small Claims Court can settle disputes about sums of up to £200,000), or make a Statutory Payment Demand - however, be careful as, while this is a low cost option, the requirements and rules are quite strict. You can find some more information on each option below.

What is the Small Claims Court and how does it work for claims on overdue invoices?

The Small Claims Court is authorised by the government to decide civil disputes over relatively small amounts of money (up to £200,000). 

Court fees are also low and vary with the amount of money you're claiming for. For a claim for up to £300, you will only have to pay £35, for example. 

Moreover, there is usually no need for legal representation in Small Claims Court, as hearings are rare. In normal cases, the Small Claims Court won't allow anyone to recover the cost of legal representation, even if they win, so using a lawyer might make things unnecessarily expensive, especially since dealing with small sums of money. This also makes this a relatively low-risk option as your expenses are usually limited to the court fee.

What to consider before going to Small Claims Court

Before making your claim to the Small Claims Court, here are a few things to keep in mind:

 to start a claim. If you want more information on the process, click 

 to go to the government's page, which will explain everything to you in detail.

A statutory demand is a formal way to ask for your bills to be paid. Essentially, it is a written warning that gives the debtor a fixed amount of time to either pay for their unpaid invoices or arrange an alternative deal. Otherwise, the debtor might be declared bankrupt.

Again, here are a few things to keep in mind:

Note furthermore that different forms are available based on your circumstances; make sure to read them carefully to ensure you choose the one that is most relevant to your situation.

 to access the forms on the government's page. Upon receiving the statutory demand, your client will have a payment deadline of 21 days to either pay the debt or reach an agreement to pay. 

 to know more about the process, and what to do if your demand is ignored.

We appreciate that legal procedures can be quite complex, so if you feel like you need extra guidance, do not hesitate to go to 

, where you can get a free instant legal assessment and also legal advice from qualified professionals.

How Do I Chase Unpaid Invoices As A Freelancer?

As the CEO & Founder of a company that is outrightly competing with none other than Google in providing answers to legal questions and help with understanding the law, I often get asked which shortcomings the almighty Google has and how a comparatively tiny company has a chance at providing a user experience people want and prefer.

It’s a good question and one that I should better have a good answer for, given that I am staking a significant part of our strategy on our ability to attract users with a superior experience!

First of all, it makes sense to review what Google can currently do when it comes to solving legal problems. Let’s try a sample query such as: 

“can my landlord increase my rent even though my tenancy agreement says he can't”

Apart from the large amount of ads, this is a great result. Within 0.61 seconds, we get a one-sentence answer to our question from a reputable source, directly on the search results page. I don’t even have to go into the website quoted.

Let’s try the same search query — “

can my landlord increase my rent even though my tenancy agreement says he can't

” — on CourtCorrect (at the time of writing we don’t have the AI in a nice UI yet, so sorry for the lack thereof). Here is the top result:

“For a periodic tenancy (rolling on a week-by-week or month-by-month basis) your landlord cannot normally increase the rent more than once a year without your agreement. For a fixed-term tenancy (running for a set period) your landlord can only increase the rent if you agree. If you do not agree, the rent can only be increased when the fixed term ends.”

Well. That’s not too shabby either! This result also directly answers the question asked and was retrieved in less than a second. You may even argue that CourtCorrect’s response is better because it provides scenarios for different types of tenancy agreements and because there aren’t any ads. But we wouldn’t do that because that would be arrogant and 

At the time of writing, we spent roughly 3 weeks on building out our search algorithm. Google is already a trillion-dollar company. So you could argue that, while we can’t beat Google on question answering and search queries in general, we do have a chance at being at least as good as Google on this task if we focus on a particular domain like law. Let’s see where we are in 6 months 😉

Oh — and then there is the fact that we also show similar cases to yours from our database of over 10 million cases — 

But what if you actually need to now do something to fix the problem you just got information on? What if you want to get your landlord to agree to the lower rent that he is legally required to accept?

If you go on Google, your search journey on Google ends with the search results. Of course it does — Google is a 

. For anything else, you have to rely on the services 

But CourtCorrect is not a search engine — CourtCorrect is an 

. This means that you can actually get the follow-on services from CourtCorrect 

. So to improve on the user journey via Google, we need to at least be as good as Google when it comes to finding information (check ✅), and then also compete with the services offered by the search results.

Fortunately, this second step is much easier. Take, for example, our “Write a Letter” feature. This feature allows you to craft a beautiful, persuasive and professional letter setting out your rights and responsibilities in a few minutes.

The services you find on Google don’t make it so easy. You’ll have to download a template to your computer, fill it out manually and then reattach it to an email or send it by post. They will also not let you specify lots of important details, like whether to include the legal assessment you got from CourtCorrect. They won’t let you add branding or a deadline and more. Here’s one file I generated and downloaded from a leading Google search result:

Legal services you find on Google vs legal services on CourtCorrect

There are of course many more things you can do on CourtCorrect. You can find suitable and thoroughly vetted lawyers by specifying details like location and financial preferences (all of which you can’t do with Google search results). You can also soon start an automatic settlement process that will hopefully do a lot better than leading Google search results like the Financial Ombudsman Service, ACAS or the Housing Ombudsman:

In addition to actually providing superior services than what you’ll find on Google, we have the added benefit that you can record anything you do on the CourtCorrect platform in your own archive of case files. This means that you’ll have a permanent record of all of your cases. How neat!

In order to beat the user journeys that start on Google and end on search results offering services, we need to compete with Google when it comes to information and with the service providers when it comes to services.

Right now, it looks like we are on track to do both. Our continuing relentless focus on helping people access justice and the user journeys they need to get justice will ensure that we succeed.

So, just how big could CourtCorrect become?

Help people in need.

Sign up to CourtCorrect to get vetted, high-quality leads.

Use CourtCorrect because...

...your marketing costs will decrease.

..all cases are vetted.

...CourtCorrect will be the only tool you need.

Legal lead generation is broken.

There's a better way.

Get new clients now.

Read what we’re up to

How Facebook's Problematic Handling Of Data Privacy Could Become A Threat To Justice

Why Google Law Doesn’t Cut It

Browse our blog to learn about your rights

Can My Landlord Increase My Rent?

CourtCorrect Launches Digital Legal Advice Project With AXA-ARAG In Switzerland